It recites, it does not judge
Ask for a trade-off and the answer slides back into slogans.
Pangu Distill
Install it on a coding agent. Distillation yields an activatable Skill, not a summary.
An idea, yourself, or a conversation can all be distilled.
Claude Code · Cursor · Codex · OpenClaw · Gemini CLI · Apache-2.0
Pain
An agent can recite “persist” and still fail to judge by a framework when it matters.
Ask for a trade-off and the answer slides back into slogans.
You never know when to pick up which line.
If failure conditions are unwritten, people pretend it always works.
Not a prettier summary. A Skill the agent can think with.
Demo
One full distillation. Delivery: mental models with triggers, plus honest boundaries.
User ❯ Distill "long-termism"
Pangu ❯ Distilling
✓ Seven-question intake (idea / decision use / no primary files)
✓ Scripted six-stream collection
✓ Seven-level extract: origin stories, decisions, failures, tensions
✓ 4.5-layer model passed triple verification
✓ Independent scoring passed (no self-grading)
Output: an activatable long-termism Skill
Models (each with origin story / trigger):
① Compound interest only pays those who stay
② The quote is not the information
③ Persistence ≠ refusing to update the map (heuristic)
Honest boundary: talking about ten years with no buffer is self-deception; distilling an idea is not becoming a practitioner
Afterward the agent judges by these models, not by “stay the course.”
Capabilities
Every Skill needs these five layers. Missing the honest boundary means it is unfinished.
First person: who I am, where I started, how others use me.
3–7 models. Each has an origin story, a trigger, reasoning steps, and limits.
Syntax, tics, forbidden words. It speaks like the framework.
Default path, judgment lines, checkable anti-patterns.
What it cannot do, information gaps, when not to use it.
A summary stacks conclusions. A framework says when to pick it up and when to put it down.
Install
Follow the GitHub repository. After install, restart or rescan, then say any line below.
Distill "long-termism"Distill myselfDistill this conversationThe same Skill runs on Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, OpenClaw, and Gemini CLI.
Trust
Collection runs scripts. Scoring cannot grade itself.
Books, transcripts, and chats you provide go first. The web only fills gaps.
Default streams: writings, interviews, expression, criticism, decisions, timeline. Failures are recorded.
Write what it cannot do and what is missing. Without this layer, it is unfinished.
Answering and scoring stay apart. You do not write it and then certify it yourself.
This page publishes no scores, no product list, and no prices.
FAQ
People already using a coding agent that can load Skills.
An activatable thinking-framework Skill, not a summary or a pile of quotes.
Open the GitHub repository and follow Quick Install. Commands stay in the repository.
Distill "long-termism". You can also distill yourself, or this conversation.
A summary gives excerpts. Distillation gives triggers, reasoning steps, and failure bounds.
No. It uses the material you provide and this conversation.
Primary files are better. If the record is thin, that goes into the honest boundary.
The repository is Apache-2.0. This page does not promise commercial service.
Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, OpenClaw, and Gemini CLI. The repository is the source of truth.
Next
Install from the repository. Then distill “long-termism.”